Skip to Content

Breaking News

A Guide to Florida Slip-and-Fall Knee Injury Settlements and Claims.  Who Is Responsible For a Florida Slip and Fall on Private Property?.  Florida Casino Slip and Fall Settlements Guide.  Did Your Florida Slip and Fall Claim Get Denied? Here’s What to Do.  How Are Slip and Fall Settlements Calculated in Florida?.  Guide to Slip and Fall Parking Lot Settlements in Florida.  Symptoms to Look for after a Fall | Personal Injury Lawyer FL.  Navigating Slip and Fall Settlements with Surgery: A Guide.  Can You Get A Slip And Fall Settlement Without Surgery in Florida?.  Who Is Liable For Slip And Falls At Apartment Complexes in Florida?. 

November 2026

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Florida: Reaching an Owner Personally

In Florida, a court can hold a business owner personally responsible for what the company did, but only when you prove three things: the owner controlled the company so completely that it had no real independent existence, the owner used the company for a fraudulent or improper purpose, and that misuse caused your injury. Owning a business, running it badly or skipping paperwork is not enough. Building that proof is trial work, and it is where an experienced Florida trial attorney changes the outcome of a case.

This guide is for people hurt by a company’s negligence who suspect the business is a thin shell: a truck carrier with no assets, a property owner hiding behind an LLC, or a company that stopped operating the day after your claim. Here is how the doctrine works and what evidence matters.

Calillaw
Protect Your Claim With Trial-Tested Advocacy
Calil Law represents individuals and businesses in serious injury and commercial litigation matters, with trial-tested judgment and careful case preparation.

TL;DR

  • Piercing the corporate veil is not a lawsuit of its own. It is a way to reach an owner after you have a claim against the company.
  • Florida courts require three showings by a preponderance of the evidence: domination as an alter ego, improper use of the corporate form, and resulting injury to you.
  • Sole ownership, a shell entity or missed formalities will not carry the claim by themselves.
  • Tort victims did not choose to deal with the company, which is why the question of whether the structure was built to shift risk to the public matters.
  • The evidence is gathered through litigation, so the sooner a lawyer preserves records, the stronger the case.

Table of Contents

What piercing the corporate veil means

A corporation or LLC is a separate legal person. If its employee injures you, the company is normally the defendant, and the owners stay out of it. That separation is the “veil.”

Piercing the veil asks a court to disregard that separation. According to the Business Law Section of The Florida Bar, it is not an independent cause of action. It is a doctrine used to impose a company’s liability on its owner when the company was the owner’s mere instrumentality and was formed or used for a fraudulent or misleading purpose.

In practice, you first need a valid claim: the company’s driver caused the crash, its property had a hazard, its product was defective. Veil piercing only matters if that claim is worth more than the company can pay.

Why Florida starts from protection for owners

Florida law gives owners strong protection by design. For LLCs, section 605.0304 of the Florida Statutes says a company’s debts and liabilities are solely the company’s, and a member or manager is not personally liable solely because of being or acting as a member or manager.

The Florida Bar Journal adds that this protection applies even when corporate formalities are not observed. So “they never held meetings” or “they kept sloppy books” will not win by itself.

The statute still leaves room for the doctrine. Section 605.0503(7)© states that it does not limit equitable principles such as alter ego, equitable lien or constructive trust. That is why courts continue to decide veil-piercing cases under the common-law test.

The three things you must prove

The Fourth District Court of Appeal restated the test in Wurtzebach v. Flooring Depot FTL, Inc. (2024). The party seeking to pierce the veil must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not):

  1. Domination. The owner controlled the company so fully that it had no independent existence and was the owner’s alter ego (a second self).
  2. Improper use. The corporate form was used fraudulently or for an improper purpose.
  3. Harm to you. You were injured as a result of that improper use.

The second element is where most cases are won or lost. The Florida Supreme Court held in Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes (1984) that the veil is not pierced without improper conduct, meaning the company was organized or used to mislead creditors or to commit a fraud on them. A Florida appellate court repeated this in 2026, requiring that the improper use proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury.

A plain-language example

Imagine a small trucking company with a single owner. After a serious crash, you learn that the owner moved every truck and bank balance into a new entity weeks earlier, kept the same dispatcher and the same customers, and left the old company with an insurance policy far below your damages. Control is clear. The timing and the transfers are evidence that the structure was being used to avoid people like you. Those facts support elements one and two, and the injury you suffered from the unpaid claim connects to element three.

Compare that with a company that simply had one owner, a modest bank account and a bad year. That alone is not improper use.

Three veil-piercing elements in the trucking example

Facts that are not enough

Florida courts are blunt about what does not carry the burden:

  • One owner or a few owners. The Third District Court of Appeal, citing Gasparini v. Pordomingo, noted that ownership by a few shareholders, or even one, is insufficient. The Supreme Court said much the same in Dania Jai-Alai: control by one or two people does not make the company a fraud.
  • A shell company used for ordinary business. In a 2026 decision, the Fourth District affirmed a ruling against the plaintiff where there was no evidence the owner used the corporate form knowingly or for an improper purpose. Using a shell to sign a lease, then breaching it, was not the necessary improper conduct.
  • Missed formalities. As above, failing to follow corporate formalities is not by itself a ground for personal liability. The Business Law Section’s article quotes the rule that, absent fraud or ulterior motive, the veil stays in place.
  • Being underinsured by accident. A business that is poorly funded is not the same as one structured to dodge its victims.

The same article observes that although the burden is a preponderance, courts in practice can behave as if the bar were higher. Plan your evidence as if you will need it to be convincing, not merely sufficient.

Why injury victims are in a different position

A supplier who signs a contract with a thinly funded company took that risk knowingly and could have asked for a guarantee. You did not. You were hit on the road or hurt on someone’s property.

Legal analysis in the Stetson Law Review points out that tort plaintiffs are non-consensual creditors, so courts examining tort cases must look closely at whether an entity was structured to shift business risks onto the public. That framing is useful when the facts show an owner who kept the profits and left the danger and the debts with an empty company.

Florida courts still apply the same elements. The difference is the story: you had no chance to protect yourself, and the evidence should show how the structure served the owner at your expense.

Why injury victims are in a different position

Veil piercing is not limited to individuals. In Segal v. Forastero, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021), the court recognized that a parent or related entity can be held liable when the plaintiff proves the subsidiary was a mere instrumentality or alter ego, used for an improper purpose that caused the injury.

This comes up with trucking fleets split across several companies, landlords who hold each building in a separate LLC, and operators who shift a business into a new entity. Courts are cautious. The Fourth District’s 2026 opinion in Wurtzebach stated that courts are generally reluctant to pierce the veil, and it reversed a ruling that had relied on alter ego and mere-continuation theories because there was no competent substantial evidence of a passing of the baton from one business to the next. Evidence of continuity has to be specific: same people, same assets, same operations, and a transfer that left the injured party unpaid.

Evidence that builds the case

The following kinds of records are the building blocks. You will not have them on day one, and you do not obtain them by asking nicely. They usually come through discovery, the formal exchange of documents and testimony in a lawsuit.

  • Ownership and control records: who the members, officers and managers are, and who actually made decisions.
  • Financial records: bank statements, loans between owner and company, personal expenses paid by the company, distributions made while claims were pending.
  • Transfers of assets: vehicles, equipment, real estate or accounts moved between entities or to family members. Where a transfer was made to put assets out of a creditor’s reach, Florida’s fraudulent transfer statute, Chapter 726, can offer a separate path.
  • Insurance: the policy limits, who bought them and what the company knew about the risks of its operations.
  • Entity history: when each company was formed, dissolved or renamed, relative to the date of your injury and your claim.
  • Business operations: shared addresses, employees, equipment and customers across related entities.

Preserving this material matters. Companies change, accounts close and employees leave. A written demand to preserve records, sent early, is part of a thorough case. Also keep an eye on the clock: your underlying injury claim has its own deadline, covered in our guide to the Florida personal injury statute of limitations.

Other routes to the same result

Veil piercing is rarely the first tool. Before you invest in it, ask whether a simpler path reaches the money:

  • Direct liability of the owner. If an owner personally did something negligent, such as directing an unsafe repair or personally operating the vehicle, the claim is against the person, and no veil is involved. The same applies to property hazards on land the individual controls; see who can be responsible in our pieces on Florida slip and fall liability and property owner liability examples.
  • Insurance coverage. Commercial policies often exist for exactly these claims. Coverage disputes can be their own fight, handled through insurance claim and bad faith litigation.
  • Other responsible parties. A crash may involve a carrier, a broker, a driver and a vehicle owner. A hazard may involve a landlord, a management company and a contractor.
  • Fraudulent transfer claims. When assets have been moved to avoid paying, Chapter 726 is a distinct remedy.
  • Reverse piercing and equity. Florida recognizes related doctrines, and the equitable principles preserved in section 605.0503 may apply in some cases.

A careful review of all of these at the start tells you whether veil piercing is worth the cost, and avoids building a case around the wrong theory.

Perspective: why the proof is a trial lawyer’s work

Injured people often tell us the same thing: the company that hurt them looks like it was set up so that nobody would ever have to pay. Sometimes that is a feeling, and sometimes the records prove it.

What we have learned in more than 18 years of Florida practice, and what we believe, is that these cases are decided by how well the facts are organized and presented. A judge or jury needs a clear account of who controlled the company, what the owner did with it, and how that left you with an injury and no way to be paid. That account is built from documents and testimony, and it has to be ready for trial, not just for negotiation.

This is why we handle veil-piercing questions inside the injury case itself. Our firm is led by a Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer and Supreme Court Certified Mediator, and you will have direct access to attorneys who personally review your case. We negotiate from strength because we prepare to try the case.

Your life has value, and a corporate structure should not be a way around that.

Jorge

How we can help

If a business injured you and you suspect its owners are hiding behind the company, we can review the claim and the structure behind it. Calil Law Trial Attorneys represents individuals injured by others’ negligence across Florida, including car accidents, truck accidents, premises liability and personal injury matters. We work on a contingency fee, which means no upfront fees: we are paid when you receive a settlement or award.

Calillaw

To talk through your situation, contact Calil Law.

FAQ

Can I sue a business owner personally after a Florida accident?

Yes, in two situations. If the owner personally acted negligently, the claim is against that person directly. If the owner’s only link is ownership, you must pierce the veil by proving domination, improper use of the company and resulting injury to you.

Is an LLC treated differently from a corporation?

Florida’s LLC statute states that members and managers are not personally liable for the company’s debts solely because of their role. Courts still apply the alter ego doctrine through equitable principles that section 605.0503 preserves, so an LLC is not beyond reach, but the same improper-use showing applies.

Does it matter that the company ignored its formalities?

It can be a piece of the picture, but not the whole picture. Florida authorities state that failing to observe formalities, standing alone, is not enough to pierce the veil. You need evidence that the structure was used for an improper purpose that harmed you.

What standard of proof applies?

Florida courts describe it as a preponderance of the evidence, meaning more likely than not. Commentary from the Business Law Section of The Florida Bar notes that in practice some courts seem to demand more, so the evidence should be strong and specific.

How soon should I act?

As soon as you suspect the company may be a shell. Records can disappear, assets can move and your underlying injury claim has a filing deadline. An early review lets a lawyer preserve evidence and choose the right theory.

Sources

Categories

  • © 2021 - 2022 Calil Law, P.A. All rights reserved.
    This website and legal marketing are managed by Calillaw Internet Media.